<span>If the primary key of the workshop offerings table contains the primary key for both the workshop table and account table, there is a many-to-many relationship between accounts and workshops.
</span><span>A </span>one-to-many relationship<span> includes the </span>primary key of<span> the “</span>one<span>” table as a foreign </span>key<span> in the “</span>many<span>” table. </span>
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below;
But before reaching to the final answers, first do the following calculations
Cash collected $108000
Add Services performed in 2017(not collected) $36000
less Services performed in 2016(collected in 2017) $25000
Revenue for 2017 $119,000
Cash paid in 2017 $72,000
Add Expense incurred not yet paid for 2017 $42000
Less Expense paid for 2016 -$30000
Expense for 2016 $84000
Now
a. Cash basis
Revenue $108000
Less Expenses -$72,000
Net income $36000
b. Accrual basis
Revenue for 2017 $119,000
Less Expenses for 2017 $84,000
Net income $35,000
1) You can get to know what career suits you the most
2) Know about the relevant options you can go for
3) Know what career suits your qualifications
4) Benefits and pros and cons
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
