It's not letting me put in the full thing but i have the rest of the answers!
Answer:
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Explanation:
From the argument above by the two senators, it could be seen that the two Senators are argueing in favour and argainst the Tax. Senator Baker, was of the believe that his opponent, Senator Rothmore calling for increase in taxes to fund programs helps the long-term unemployed.
His argument was based soley on the unemployed without factoring in the small businesses that would be killed off as a result of the tax increment. The fall of small businesses would definitely affect the prediction he made about unemployed getting work. This is because, those unemployed can only work by the opportunities created by the small businesses.
Senator Baker only made the second conclusion inorder to support his argument on the need to lower taxes which would drive job creations thereby being a win-win situation for both the government and the citizens.
C. your own skills and abilities. The only thing holding you back when you work for yourself is you.
By reading and through context, my guess would be through integration.
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that Duncan most likely found out that parental income is strongly correlated with academic achievement, especially in low-income families. Meaning the more education that the parents in a household possess the higher the overall family income would seem to be. This is mainly due to the parents having more labor opportunities.
