1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alexdok [17]
2 years ago
10

36010 feel free to answer​

Law
2 answers:
Gelneren [198K]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

1325

Explanation:

there u go mate

QveST [7]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

1325

Explanation:

You might be interested in
John left his home state of Missouri early one afternoon to drive to New Mexico. Eventually the sun set, but John continued on.
ELEN [110]
Yes, before you travel through states you are supposed to research their laws. In this case, John did not research Texas’ laws and was ticketed for speeding.
4 0
3 years ago
Researchers who ascribe to the belief that there are multiple realities to be discovered are known as
Alexxandr [17]

Answer:

yes we evolved from monkeys

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What did Oliver Wendal Holmes say limits free speech​
Mariana [72]
Answer: Holmes wrote: The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic.
Found: google
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT a reason for implementing Intermediate Sanctions?
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

Answer: Lack of evidence that the offender was actually guilty

Explanation:

Intermediate sanctions do not involve the person going to prison but they are quite intrusive as they include (but are not limited to): intensive supervision and electronic monitoring. Most people believe they should be used as punishment for nonviolent <u>crime</u>.

The keyword above is ''crime''. If there is a lack of evidence that a person committed a crime then they are presumed innocent which means they did not commit the crime in question and so do not qualify for intermediate sanctions.

3 0
3 years ago
which supreme court procedure invovles justices discussing a case, debating it's key issues, and arriving at their own opinions
oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer:

The high court involves justices discussing a case debating and arriving at their opinions on the appropriate ruling.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Someone help me please!<br> Government
    14·1 answer
  • My discord is<br><br> #1864<br><br> If anyone wants to friend me
    15·1 answer
  • Did Carole baskin killed her husband
    5·2 answers
  • By law, all apartment buildings in New Jersey must have smoke alarms in the ceilings. Mary suffers smoke inhalation because the
    15·1 answer
  • Diferencie preclusão lógica do venire contra factum proprio.
    13·1 answer
  • What would you do if you were the officer in this situation?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an acceptable kind of car insurance?
    11·2 answers
  • Why was rehabilitation not successful?
    12·1 answer
  • Discuss the United States Supreme Court's involvement in concerns over the death penalty, and include relevant case law?
    5·1 answer
  • Which hate crime category is most likely to result in murder?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!