Answer:
A.
Explanation:
This phenomenon best illustrates why intelligence tests need to be revised for predictive validity. The tests are taken initially and show high scores, then they are taken again and show even higher scores. This shows that the individuals are getting smarter. If the test continues to be taken without revision then the same results will continue since the individuals will continue to become smarter but the test will continue being the same. Therefore, becoming much easier for the participants every time. This ultimately leads to better and better scores.
Answer:
hey your answer is 2.......
The situation described is an example of classical conditioning because a stimulus (Scut Farkas laughs) causes a specific reaction (fear in the other characters)
<h3>What is classical conditioning?</h3>
Classical conditioning is a scientific theory that focused on the study of a type of associative learning developed by Ivan Pávlov.
Classical conditioning posits that an external stimulus can generate a specific response in an individual or group depending on whether it has associated both factors, for example:
- A dog makes a response (in this case, salivation) to a stimulus (the bell indicating food). The next time he heard the bell, regardless of whether it was attached to the food, he would begin to salivate.
Based on the above, it can be inferred that the situation described is an example of classical conditioning because the characters associate Scut Farkas' laughter with a feeling of fear.
Learn more about classical conditioning in: brainly.com/question/17583598
A city's population density would decrease (most likely) due to the fact that people would most likely spread out.
