1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anika [276]
3 years ago
8

Did any of their judgeships fall into their laps

Law
1 answer:
SpyIntel [72]3 years ago
5 0
Many people in Law did not let it fall into there laps so no
You might be interested in
Explain the difference between operating forces and the short establishment
Afina-wow [57]
The Shore Establishment is composed of 17 naval commanders, bureaus, officers and centers. The centers recruit, organize, train, equip and suppport the Navy Operating Forces. They all report to the Chief of Naval Operations and provide, train, and equip naval forces.
8 0
3 years ago
Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burde
BigorU [14]

I think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted is more appropriate.

<h3>Who is a Defendant?</h3>

This is referred to as the individual or group which have been accused of breaking the law and is being tried in court.

It is more appropriate for the defendants to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted because the jury will employ  the use of evidences and testimonies in other to give a verdict. This ensures fair judgement and prevent innocent from being punished unjustly.

Read more about Defendant here brainly.com/question/7315287

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
4. Topic: should gun control be tightened
Serjik [45]

Answer:

The Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller was a landmark case that determined that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess a firearm, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. This case is significant in regards to the Second Amendment because it affirms that the right to bear arms is an individual right, and not just a right that pertains to militias.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

5 0
1 year ago
Why is the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims neither a court of first instance nor a court of final instance?
juin [17]

Since this is an appellate court, all cases have already been heard, so it cannot be a court of first instance

8 0
4 years ago
3
svetoff [14.1K]

because its is the most op coat

Explanation:

because it is so it supreme coat

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are opinions or feelings about the candidates(2020 debate) ?
    6·2 answers
  • Which other qualifications must a citizen meet before he or she can serve on a jury?
    7·2 answers
  • A penny can be used in which part of vehicle maintenance? checking oil level checking tire tread depth monitoring emissions chec
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following developments during the 1780s produced the STRONGEST calls for a new national constitution and government
    5·1 answer
  • Mayonnaise on an escalator its going ups stairs so see ya later
    12·1 answer
  • Los determinantes posesivos indican quien ------ algo o a quien
    13·1 answer
  • Pick one
    10·2 answers
  • Question 11 (1 point)
    12·1 answer
  • What is it called when a state grants a city the ability to govern its own local affairs?.
    11·1 answer
  • Which model emphasizes public order and swift, efficient, and effective justice?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!