1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
krek1111 [17]
2 years ago
6

Why is brainly deleting questions???​

Law
2 answers:
antiseptic1488 [7]2 years ago
8 0
I don’t know but it’s annoying
alexandr402 [8]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

that is what I'm wondering!!! I clicks notification from brainly, boom, the question is gone

You might be interested in
Baker and others entered a Wal-Mart store shortly after 3:00 A.M. by cutting through the metal door with an acetylene torch. Som
hodyreva [135]

Answer:

There are enough intent and action to commit a crime.  By burglarizing the store and moving some goods to the rear door, Baker and his co-travellers have established specific intent to commit larceny.

Specific intent requires planning before the time and the predisposition to commit the act.  They have even establish general intent by actually entering the store and cutting through the metal door with an acetylene torch.

Explanation:

Larceny is robbery.  The intent to commit a crime by Baker and his co-travellers is established by their actions at the crime scene.  They cannot be exonerated because they have not yet taken the goods away from the store.  But, it can be established that the intent exists merely by their presence at the crime scene at such an hour of the morning.

8 0
3 years ago
A father kicks out his seventeen year old son a week before his eighteenth birthday, the school is notified, nothing is done and
prohojiy [21]

Answer: he should tell the judge that he kicked  me out one week before i turned  18 and he also kicked my 15 year old his way younger  than me and he still kicked him out and we both live with our grandma now.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Jack purchases a cola drink at a fast food chain, while drinking he determines the cola is a caustic drain cleaner. Jack may sue
Natali [406]

Answer:

breach of the implied of merchantability

Explanation:

Implied warrant of merchantability happens when an individual such as jack in this question, goes to buy a product that did not work as expected. In this case, Jack requested for a Cola drink which he bought and later realized it was caustic drain cleaner. The warranty guarantees that the cola drink gotten from the fast food chain must work according to why it was purchased and the sellers are not required to explain to jack that Cola drink is what he was going to get when buying the product from them because the law on its own, creates that warranty.

5 0
2 years ago
In your opinion, what is the most important law and why?
CaHeK987 [17]
Courts because they help settle things
8 0
3 years ago
GIMME FERRET NAMES. It's gonna be either white or sable mask. And a boy. I like Bandit and Ghost but tell me what you guys think
liberstina [14]

Answer:

I like the name Bandit

Explanation:

Mark me brainliest please

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following powers of the president does NOT require the consent of
    6·2 answers
  • Describe what lawyers do in 2 paragraph.
    5·1 answer
  • How do opinions and facts contribute to whether or not an issue needs civic attention or not?
    14·1 answer
  • What benefits does U.S. Army offer?
    12·1 answer
  • If i don't do my project will i still graduate high school
    13·2 answers
  • Ronald Rawls and Zabian Bailey were in an auto accident in Bridgeport, Connecticut. Bailey rear-ended Rawls at a stoplight. The
    15·1 answer
  • Which is the BEST explanation for the reason our "Founding Fathers" built a system of checks and balances into our government?Th
    6·1 answer
  • Why does soft money tend to exert more influence in elections than hard money? a.Soft money can only be used for ads that are no
    6·1 answer
  • What are the ways in which media can ensure access of information to all communities
    15·1 answer
  • an injury that occurs while an employee is commuting to or from work is usually not considered to have occurred on the job or in
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!