The relative unfairness of an apportionment that gives a new board member to joshua rather than to salinas will be
<h3>How to calculate the values?</h3>
The relative unfairness of an apportionment that gives a new board member to joshua rather than to salinas will be:
= (1520 - 1232)/1232
= 288/1232
= 0.234
The relative unfairness of an apportionment that gives a new board member to salinas rather than to Joshua will be:
= (1448 - 1333)/1333
= 115/1333
= 0.086
The regional governing board that should receive the new board member is Salinas.
Learn more about tables on:
brainly.com/question/3632175
#SPJ1
Answer:
(0,-3)
Step-by-step explanation:
You can just graph it and find the center.
Please put me as brainliest. Thank you.
Let's solve your equation step-by-step.
−3x2−4x−4=0
Step 1: Use quadratic formula with a=-3, b=-4, c=-4.
x=
−b±√b2−4ac
2a
x=
−(−4)±√(−4)2−4(−3)(−4)
2(−3)
x=
4±√−32
−6
Answer:
No real solutions.
Answer:
Her opportunity cost of reading 10 pages of sociology is 15 pages of Economics
Her opportunity cost of reading 18 pages of economics is 12 pages of sociology.
Step-by-step explanation:
For economics, Latasha reads 1 page in 2 mins (gotten by dividing the number of pages by the time taken to read it i.e 30 pages in 1 hr or 60 mins)
Her sociology is read 1 page in 3 mins (20 pages read in 60 mins)
To read 10 pages of sociology will take 30 mins. She will read 15 pages of Economics in the same time which is the opportunity cost.
In the same vein, It will take her 36 mins to read 18 pages of Economics at the same rate. This is the opportunity cost of reading 12 pages of Sociology (which she reads at 1 page in 3 mins).
<span>A. When adding two rational numbers a/b and c/d, the numerators a and c do not have to be integers. Therefore, the sum does not have to be a rational number. I think this is right might nor be :/
</span>
