Answer:
0.76
Explanation:
So, in this particular question we are given that that there are two assets which are the; [1]. stock fund and [2]. a long-term government and corporate bond fund.
From the question/problem, we have that the Expected ret and the std. dev. for the Stock fund is 18% and 25% respectively. Also, the Expected ret and std. dev. for Bond fund 11% and 18% respectively.
Thus, the investment proportion in the minimum variance portfolio of the bond fund = 1 - [ ( 18%)² - 0.4 × 25% × 18%) ÷ ( 25%)² + (18%)² - 2 × 0.4 × 25% × 18%. = 1 - [0.0144 ÷ 0.0609 ] = 1 - 0.24 = 0.76.
Answer:
D) Even with an absolute advantage, the United States would have benefited from importing those products for which Britain had a comparative advantage.
Explanation:
The basis for foreign trade are comparative advantages, not absolute advantages. You must remember that in order for trade to be effective and long lasting, both sides must benefit from it, not just one side.
Resources are limited, and that applies to everyone, to every corporation and to every country. You might have an absolute advantage at producing everything, but your production possibilities frontier sets you a limit on what products or combination of products you can produce. Sometimes it might be beneficial to trade and receive some products that you could produce more efficiently, but their opportunity costs might be too high. Probably you can get them at lower costs from foreign suppliers and use those resources for producing something else.
Answer:
write in English
Explanation:
write in English so I can help you
Answer:
Adam Smith, author of "The Wealth of Nations", was a staunch believer in the free market and private property. Karl Marx, on the other hand, believed that the free market was destroying the world and leading to the "exploitation" of the middle class and the poor.
False. Capitalism is an example of a free-trade economy. I'm pretty sure that is Socialism.