9514 1404 393
Answer:
x in {-6, -2, 4}
Step-by-step explanation:
The zero product rule tells you that a product will be zero if and only if one of the factors is zero. These binomial factors are zero when x has a value that is opposite the constant of the binomial.
x +6 = 0 ⇒ x = -6
x -4 = 0 ⇒ x = 4
x +2 = 0 ⇒ x = -2
The zeros of the function are the x-values -6, -2, and 4.
Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:
The alternative hypothesis is:
If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
(x-9)²
= (x-9)(x-9)
= x²-9x-9x+81
= x²-18x+81
(x - 6) * 2
I'm assuming this is the expression that you typed out, if it isn't, please let me know in the comments :)
Use the distributive property:
= 2(x) - 2(6)
Multiply and simplify
= 2x - 12
This should be the expression that is equivalent to the original. Let me know if you need any clarifications, thanks!
Given:
hourly rate = 11.50
hours worked in a week = 40 hours
taxes per moth = 60
Every month may be 4 weeks or 5 weeks but we know that 1 year has 52.1429 weeks.
Let us compute for the whole year:
Earnings:
11.50 /1 hour * 40 hours/1week * 52.1429 weeks/1year
= 11.50 * 40 * 52.1429/year
= 23,985.734 per year
Taxes:
60 / per month * 12 months / 1 year
= 60 * 12/year
= 720 per year
Net earning per year
23,985.734 - 720 = 23,264.734
Net earning per month
23,264.734 ÷ 12 months = 1,938.81
You will earn 23,264.73 annually from a monthly earning of 1,938.81
