Answer: The child will engage himself in free exploration to the surrounding, and also be happy upon the caregiver's return
Explanation:
According to the theories of John Bowlby (1988), a child is securely-attached if she is confident of her caregiver’s support. The attachment figure serves as a "secure base" from which the child can confidently explore the world.
The securely-attached child explores the room freely when his mother is present. He may be distressed when his mother leaves, and he explores less when she is absent. But he is happy when she returns.
If he cries, he approaches his mother and holds her tightly. He is comforted by being held, and, once comforted, he is soon ready to resume his independent exploration of the world. His mother is responsive to his needs. As a result, he knows he can depend on her when he is under stress (Ainsworth et al 1978)
Secure attachment is also associated with
keeping track of the caregiver during exploration,approaching or touching the caregiver when anxious or distressed;finding comfort in proximity and contact
And, in the long-term, kids with secure attachments seem to have many advantages - emotional, social, medical, and cognitive.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)) (also I took the test so ik its not B cause I got it wrong)
Answer:
Systems
Explanation:
In the experiment, a group of subjects are divided into two groups (the prisoners and the guards)\
Before the experiment, the two groups are completely at peace and friendly with one another.
But because the system in the experiment made the guards group have overwhelming power toward the prisoners, the prison groups start to abuse that power and treat the prisoners badly. This indicates that the system which granted their power could drastically alter their behavior in a very short period of time.
Answer:
Kyle will not collect any damages since he did not sustain any damages.
Explanation:
As Kyle did not have any negative health effects from the incident he suffered in the restaurant, there are low chances that he will perceive any money from suing the restaurant for negligence. There is no evidence to prove that the place committed an act of negligence.
