Answer:
No
Explanation:
The independent irrelevant alternative criterion is not violated here. The law of irrelevant alternative criterion holds that if candidate A is liked more than candidate B then a new candidate C who is liked less than candidate A should not spoil the victory of Candidate A, so that candidate B wins.
In the example in the question, candidate Parker was the preferred candidate before the elimination of candidate Myers and so will still be the winner of the election, therefore the irrelevant alternative criterion has not been violated.
If 13% of 100 is 13, than 13% of 100 million is 13 million. And multiplying two on both sides, we get that 13% of 200 million is 26 million. If we take it the other way, we get that 13% of 50 million is 6.5 million. As 6.5 million + 25 million is 31.5 million, this is our answer.
1+1+1 is 3. And you have 1/3+1/3+1/3=3/3=1. So you end up with 3+1=4. So yes
The number is 28.
The equation would be:
237 + 6(x) = 405
The problem states that 6 times the opposite of a number, however, since the number sign was not given, we do not know whether it is in a positive or negative form. So we leave it as only x.
237 + 6x = 405
6x = 405 - 237
6x = 168
6x / 6 = 168 / 6
x = 28
To check:
237 + 6 (28) = 405
237 + 168 = 405
405 = 405
Answer:
h/2
Step-by-step explanation:
A=(a+b) h/2
