Answer:
the fund balance is $1,727,056.25
Explanation:
The computation of the fund balance is shown below:
Given that
PMT = $125,000
NPER = 10
RATE = 7%
PV = $0
The formula is shown below:
= -FV(RATE,NPER,PMT,PV,TYPE)
After applying the above formula, the fund balance is $1,727,056.25
Here basically the future value formula should be applied
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
The following would be the specifications of the training module for the cashiers:
1. There would be multiple modules consisting of the job responsibilities as refresher courses and at the same time, the new market conditions and additional job related things that they must be doing in the near future would be the other modules.
2. The key areas that the multi module training program would be focussing on would be, customer relationship training, system and data maintenance training, documentation and accounting module
3. The training intervention would be preferably on job and alongside there would be a mentor/coach allotted to the cashiers who are experts in the field preferably store managers and functional experts. For the system related modules, they would be having simulation based modules. Only during the non rush-hours there would be offline training and update sessions with respect to the progress made on their training and the productivity improvement they have achieved over the past week.
The incentives associated with the productivity improvement would be translated into incentivising the cashiers to take up the training modules. The weekly update on the productivity improvement and the progress in their training would inturn make them competitive in nature. While coming to why such distribution has been done with respect to the modules, essentially if we look at the job of the cashiers, it’s a round the clock job and they would lose out on precious working hours if the training is done on an offline basis.
The simulations would definitely help understand the process but the on job training would be the one that is standing out, as they would be continuing their task and at the same time, the result is right in front on them to experience and therefore the distribution of the modules to not stress them out and at the same time not losing out on their time as well.
Answer:
Equivalent units of production= 98,700
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Physical Units Work in process, beginning 0
Completed and transferred out 90,900
Work in process, ending 7,800
Materials are added at the beginning of the process.
<u>To calculate the equivalent units, we need to use the following formula:</u>
<u></u>
Units completed in the period + Equivalent units in ending inventory WIP (units*%completion) = Equivalent units of production
Equivalent units of production= 0 + 90,900 + 7,800*1
Equivalent units of production= 98,700
Because the materials are added at the beginning of the process, the percentage of completion is 100%.
Answer:
$138,000
Explanation:
The computation of the machine cost that would be reported is shown below:
= Purchase value of machine + shipping cost + installation cost + testing cost
= $126,000 + $3,000 + $4,000 + $5,000
= $138,000
At the time of reporting the machine cost, we have to consider all the cost that is related to the machine. Therefore, all the given cost is considered.
<span>Grapes are a(n) "normal good" with an income elasticity of demand of "0.8". A normal good is a good for which an increase in income results in increased demand, while decreased income results in decreased demand. Thus, we know that the first blank is "normal good" by the definition of a normal good becuase median income fell and demand for grapes fell. The X elasticity of demand is given by (%change in Demand)/(%change in X), where x is any economic variable (income in this case). Thus, to find the elasticity, we divide 12% by 15%. 12%/15%=.08.</span>