I don't know if that is factor-able. It looks like you could just subtract and get 64t. which would lead to the answer being zero since you divide by zero when isolating the variable t.
Sometimes when you’re doing math, it’s easier to line your numbers up when you have your ratio as a decimal! Hope it helped
I believe just 1 because an equilateral triangle can only be reflected on one line for the halves to be the same
Okay well, just by looking at the graph. It’s a negative slope and the only answer, that has a negative is the 3 one.
<h3>2
Answers: Choice C and choice D</h3>
y = csc(x) and y = sec(x)
==========================================================
Explanation:
The term "zeroes" in this case is the same as "roots" and "x intercepts". Any root is of the form (k, 0), where k is some real number. A root always occurs when y = 0.
Use GeoGebra, Desmos, or any graphing tool you prefer. If you graphed y = cos(x), you'll see that the curve crosses the x axis infinitely many times. Therefore, it has infinitely many roots. We can cross choice A off the list.
The same applies to...
- y = cot(x)
- y = sin(x)
- y = tan(x)
So we can rule out choices B, E and F.
Only choice C and D have graphs that do not have any x intercepts at all.
------------
If you're curious why csc doesn't have any roots, consider the fact that
csc(x) = 1/sin(x)
and ask yourself "when is that fraction equal to zero?". The answer is "never" because the numerator is always 1, and the denominator cannot be zero. If the denominator were zero, then we'd have a division by zero error. So that's why csc(x) can't ever be zero. The same applies to sec(x) as well.
sec(x) = 1/cos(x)
