Answer:
c. percentage change in price and percentage change in quantity demanded.
Explanation:
A price elasticity of demand can be defined as a measure of the responsiveness of the quantity of a product demanded with respect to a change in price of the product, all things being equal.
The price-elasticity of demand coefficient, Ed, is measured in terms of percentage change in price and percentage change in quantity demanded.
The demand for goods is said to be elastic, when the quantity of goods demanded by consumers with respect to change in price is very large. Thus, the more easily a consumer can switch to a substitute product in relation to change in price, the greater the elasticity of demand.
Generally, consumers would like to be buy a product as its price falls or become inexpensive.
For substitute products (goods), the price elasticity of demand is always positive because the demand of a product increases when the price of its close substitute (alternative) increases.
If the price elasticity of demand for a product equals 1, as its price rises the total revenue does not change because the demand is unit elastic.
Answer:
BE Scoping strategy CC Horizontal scope D.A)Horizontal installation.
Answer:
12,600
Explanation:
Concept of Equivalent units of production measures the number of units in terms of percentage completion in input elements of the process.
<u>The equivalent units of production for materials</u>
Note : all materials are issued at the beginning of the process, therefore materials are 100% complete in both Widgets transferred out and Ending widgets.
Calculation :
transferred out (8,600 × 100%) = 8,600
ending inventory (4,000 × 100%) = 4,000
total = 12,600
Therefore, the equivalent units of production for materials in the Machining Department is 12,600.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Neither Italy or New Zealand.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is the ability of an individual or organization to manufacture its products at a lower opportunity cost than its competitors. The scenario does not imply the individual has an absolute advantage. It actually means it sacrifices less to achieve that goal.
Thus, <em>Portugal has a lower opportunity cost than Italy in producing a bottle of wine. Portugal's opportunity cost is 1/2 while Italy's opportunity cost is 2. Neither Italy or New Zealand (or any other country not mentioned in the example) has a comparative advantage in producing wine</em>.
