Answer: Vertex = (2, -15) 2nd point = (0, -3)
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
g(x) = 3x² - 12x - 3
= 3(x² - 4x - 1)
a=1 b=-4 c=-1
Find the x-value of the vertex by using the formula for the axis of symmetry: 
= 2
Find the y-value of the vertex by plugging the x-value (above) into the given equation: g(x) = 3x² - 12x - 3
g(2) = 3(2)² - 12(2) - 3
= 12 - 24 - 3
= -15
So, the vertex is (2, -15) ← PLOT THIS COORDINATE
Now, choose a different x-value. Plug it into the equation and solve for y. <em>I chose x = 0</em>
g(0) = 3(0)² - 12(0) - 3
= 0 - 0 - 3
= -3
So, an additional point is (0, -3) ← PLOT THIS COORDINATE
Greg’s hourly wage is $9.35 per hour
Answer:
C. Kalena made a mistake in Step 3. The justification should state: -x²
+ x²
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the function x(x - 1)(x + 1) = x3 - X
To justify kelena proof
We will need to show if the two equations are equal.
Starting from the RHS with function x³-x
First we will factor out the common factor which is 'x' to have;
x(x²-1)
Factorising x²-1 using the difference of two square will give;
x(x+1)(x-1)
Note that for two real number a and b, the expansion of a²-b² using difference vof two square will give;
a²-b² = (a+b)(a-b) hence;
Factorising x²-1 using the difference of two square will give;
x(x+1)(x-1)
Factorising x(x+1) gives x²+x, therefore
x(x+1)(x-1) = (x²+x)(x-1)
(x²+x)(x-1) = x³-x²+x²-x
The function x³-x²+x²-x gotten shows that kelena made a mistake in step 3, the justification should be -x²+x² not -x-x²
Answer:
x≥−8
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1: Simplify both sides of the inequality.
−4x−6≤26
Step 2: Add 6 to both sides.
−4x−6+6≤26+6
−4x≤32
Step 3: Divide both sides by -4.
−4x/−4 ≤ 32/−4
x≥−8
Try math way . com , its free and lets you enter all different types of problems!!
