Answer:
C) if the court finds that Shawn has substantially performed, he will be able to recover the contract price less any damages caused by his failure to perform as promised.
Explanation:
From the question Harry signed a contract with Shawn to build a house. Harry made some specification to build the house. But Shawn did not follow the specifications now Harry doesn't want to pay him the contract amount.
Under doctrine of specific performance, Harry can pay less money than the contract price. Because Shawn has performed substantially, he is not entitled to receive the contract price as agreed.
Answer:
10.52 years
Explanation:
We can work out the number of years using this relationship
V =P× (1+r)^n
V= tribe valeu = 3×3.5 = 10.5
r-growth rate -11%
n- number of years- ?
10.5 = 3.5× (1.11)^n
<em>dividing both sides by 1.11^n</em>
1.11^n = 10.5/3.5
<em>taking the log of both sides</em>
n log 1.11 = log 3
n = log 3/log 1.11
n =10.52
Answer:
Put options give the holder the right to sell the underlying stock to the seller of the put option.
Put options are advantageous when the price in the market falls below the strike price of the option because the buyer will be able to sell at above market value and make a profit.
The asking price for a strike price of $9.00 is listed to be $0.33 and this is the premium paid by the buyer of the Put Option.
<h2>
1. Return if stock sells for $8.00</h2>
= Amount received/ Amount spent
= (No. of shares * ((Strike price - Market price) - Premium paid) ) / (No. of share * premium)
= (2,300 shares * (($9.00 - 8.00) - 0.33))/ ( 2,300 * 0.33)
= 2.03
= 203 %
<h2>
2. Return if stock sells for $10.00. </h2>
As this is an option, the investor can decide not to sell to the seller. The market price is higher than the strike price so they will not sell to the seller of the option and the return will be;
= (No. of shares * - Premium paid) ) / (No. of share * premium)
= (2,300 shares * - 0.33)/ ( 2,300 * 0.33)
= -1
= -100 %
Answer:
Deceptive sales technique
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that what the salesperson did in this scenario is an example of a Deceptive sales technique. This term refers to when a salesperson pushes a product or service on a customer with high-pressure by appealing to that individuals potential fears, greed, or vanity in order to convince them on purchasing the product. Exactly what the salesperson did to Jordan.