Answer:
x = -1
Step-by-step explanation:
The usual approach to these is to square the radicals until they are gone.
Each time the equation is squared, the possibility of an extraneous root is introduced. Here, x=3 is extraneous: it does not satisfy the original equation.
The solution is x = -1.
_____
Using a graphing calculator to solve the original equation can avoid extraneous solutions. The attachment shows only the solution x = -1. Rather than use f(x) = 2, we have rewritten the equation to f(x)-2 = 0. The graphing calculator is really good at showing the function values at the x-intercepts.
It belongs to the rational numbers.
It is the ratio of two integers, 2 and 3.
Answer:
50*
Step-by-step explanation:
Giving the table below which shows <span>the percent increase of donations made on behalf of a non-profit organization for the period of 1984 to 2003.
</span>
Year: 1984 1989 1993 1997 2001 2003
Percent: 7.8 16.3 26.2 38.9 49.2 62.1
The scatter plot of the data is attached with the x-axis representing the number of years after 1980 and the y-axis representing the percent increase <span>of donations made on behalf of a non-profit organization.
To find the equation for the line of regression where </span><span>the x-axis representing the number of years after 1980 and the y-axis representing the percent increase of donations made on behalf of a non-profit organization.
![\begin{center} \begin{tabular}{ c| c| c| c| } x & y & x^2 & xy \\ [1ex] 4 & 7.8 & 16 & 31.2 \\ 9 & 16.3 & 81 & 146.7 \\ 13 & 26.2 & 169 & 340.6 \\ 17 & 38.9 & 289 & 661.3 \\ 21 & 49.2 & 441 & 1,033.2 \\ 23 & 62.1 & 529 & 1,428.3 \\ [1ex] \Sigma x=87 & \Sigma y=200.5 & \Sigma x^2=1,525 & \Sigma xy=3,641.3 \end{tabular} \end{center}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Bcenter%7D%0A%5Cbegin%7Btabular%7D%7B%20c%7C%20c%7C%20c%7C%20c%7C%20%7D%0A%20x%20%26%20y%20%26%20x%5E2%20%26%20xy%20%5C%5C%20%5B1ex%5D%20%0A%204%20%26%207.8%20%26%2016%20%26%2031.2%20%5C%5C%20%20%0A%209%20%26%2016.3%20%26%2081%20%26%20146.7%20%5C%5C%20%0A13%20%26%2026.2%20%26%20169%20%26%20340.6%20%5C%5C%20%0A17%20%26%2038.9%20%26%20289%20%26%20661.3%20%5C%5C%20%0A21%20%26%2049.2%20%26%20441%20%26%201%2C033.2%20%5C%5C%20%0A23%20%26%2062.1%20%26%20529%20%26%201%2C428.3%20%5C%5C%20%5B1ex%5D%0A%5CSigma%20x%3D87%20%26%20%5CSigma%20y%3D200.5%20%26%20%5CSigma%20x%5E2%3D1%2C525%20%26%20%5CSigma%20xy%3D3%2C641.3%20%20%0A%5Cend%7Btabular%7D%0A%5Cend%7Bcenter%7D)
</span>
Recall that the equation of the regression line is given by
where
and
Thus, the equation of the regresson line is given by
The graph of the regression line is attached.
Using the equation, we can predict the percent donated in the year 2015. Recall that 2015 is 35 years after 1980. Thus x = 35.
The percent donated in the year 2015 is given by
Therefore, the percent donated in the year 2015 is predicted to be 90.5
For the equation y - x < 0,
y < x
The shaded portion will be under the dashed line joining points (-2, -2) and (3, 3).
for the equation x - 1 > 0,
x > 1
The shaded portion will be to the right of the dashed line joining points (1, 5) and (1, -3).
The portion affected by the two shadings will be the portion common to the right of the dashed line joining points (1, 5) and (1, -3) and under the dashed line joining points (-2, -2) and (3, 3).
Therefore the correct answer is option c.
