All categories

3 years ago

The three types of intermolecular forces have different strengths. Rank

1 answer:

3 0

There are three different types of intermolecular forces in terms of strength. They are (strongest to weakest) hydrogen bonding, dipole-dipole and Van der Waals' forces.

You might be interested in

Which is the best description of a chain of custody?

leonid [27]

<span> D) A log of who has handled the evidence and when so the integrity of the evidence is upheld. </span>

7 0

3 years ago

Describe the relationship between kinetic energy and mass

zhannawk [14.2K]

Answer:

Kinetic energy has a direct relationship with mass, meaning that as mass increases so does the Kinetic Energy of an object. ... Objects with greater mass can have more kinetic energy even if they are moving more slowly, and objects moving at much greater speeds can have more kinetic energy even if they have less mass

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How is electrovalent bond formed ? Describe with an example .

Scrat [10]

Answer:

For example, the bond between the sodium and chlorine atoms in sodium chloride (NaCl) is formed by the transfer of an electron from sodium to chlorine, creating Na + and Cl – ions. ... The electrostatic attraction between these ions provides the bonding in NaCl.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following characteristics describe a paramecium

marishachu [46]

Answer:

i think it's a (not sure)

7 0

3 years ago

9. The times of first sprinkler activation (in seconds) for a series of tests of fire-prevention sprinkler systems that use aque

Nezavi [6.7K]

This question is incomplete, the complete question is;

The times of first sprinkler activation (in seconds) for a series of tests of fire-prevention sprinkler systems that use aqueous film-forming foam is as follows; 27 41 22 27 23 35 30 33 24 27 28 22 24

( see " use of AFFF in sprinkler systems," Fire technology, 1975: 5)

The system has been designed so that the true average activation time is supposed to be at most 25 seconds.

Does the data indicate the design specifications have not been met?

Test the relevant hypothesis at significance level 0.05 using the P-value approach

Answer:

since p-value (0.042299) is lesser than the level of significance ( 0.05)

We Reject Null Hypothesis

Hence, There is no sufficient evidence that the true average activation time is at most 25 seconds

Explanation:

Given the data in the question;

lets consider Null and Alternative hypothesis;

Null hypothesis H₀ : There is sufficient evidence that the true average activation time is at most 25 seconds

Alternative hypothesis H₁ : There is no sufficient evidence that the true average activation time is at most 25 seconds

i.e

Null hypothesis H₀ : μ ≤ 25

Alternative hypothesis H₁ : μ > 25

level of significance σ = 0.05

first we determine the sample mean;

$x^{bar}$ = $\frac{1}{n}$ ∑ $x_{i}$

where n is sample size and ∑ $x_{i}$ is summation of all the sample;

= $\frac{1}{13}$ ( 27 + 41 + 22 + 27 + 23 + 35 + 30 + 33 + 24 + 27 + 28 + 22 + 24 )

= $\frac{1}{13}$ ( 363

sample mean $x^{bar}$ = 27.9231

next we find the standard deviation

s = √( $\frac{1}{n-1}$ ∑( $x_{i}-x^{bar}$ )²

x ( $x_{i}-x^{bar}$ ) ( $x_{i}-x^{bar}$ )²

27 -0.9231 0.8521

41 13.0769 171.0053

22 -5.9231 35.0831

27 -0.9231 0.8521

23 -4.9231 24.2369

35 7.0769 50.0825

30 2.0769 4.3135

33 5.0769 25.7749

24 -3.9231 15.3907

27 -0.9231 0.8521

28 0.0769 0.0059

22 -5.9231 35.0831

24 -3.9231 15.3907

sum 378.9229

so ∑( $x_{i}-x^{bar}$ )² = 378.9229

∴

s = √( $\frac{1}{13-1}$ ×378.9229 )

s = √31.5769

standard deviation s = 5.6193

now, the Test statistics

t = ( $x^{bar}$ - μ ) / $\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} }$

we substitute

t = ( 27.9231 - 25 ) / $\frac{5.6193}{\sqrt{13} }$

t = 2.9231 / 1.5585

t = 1.88

now degree of freedom df = n - 1 = 13 - 1 = 12

next we calculate p-value

p-value = 0.042299 ( using Execl's ( = TDIST(1.88,12,1)))

Here x=1.88, df=12, one tail

now we compare the p-value with the level of significance

since p-value (0.042299) is lesser than the level of significance ( 0.05)

We Reject Null Hypothesis

Hence, There is no sufficient evidence that the true average activation time is at most 25 seconds

3 0

3 years ago