Answer:
17%
Explanation:
The actual return which stockholder receives on the average common equity is return on common stockholder's equity.
Return on Common Stockholder Equity = (Net Income - Preferred dividend) / Average common stockholders equity
Return on Common Stockholder Equity = ($298,000 - (10,000 x $100 x 6%) / ( ( $1,200,000 + $1,600,000 ) / 2 )
Return on Common Stockholder Equity = ($298,000 - $60,000) / $1,400,000
Return on Common Stockholder Equity = 0.17 = 17%
Martha Stewart is a Lifestyle guru and businesswoman. She was born Martha Kostyra, on August 3, 1941, in New Jersey.
Martha Stewart started her work as a model at the age of 13, she used to appear in fashion shows as well as television and print advertisements. She also<span> started a catering business in the late 1970s. Soon she was known for her gourmet menus and unique, creative presentation.</span>
In deciding on a legal form of organization, you should ask yourself how many employees will you hire.
<h3>What is an organization?</h3>
An organization refers to an organized group of people with a particular purpose such as any business or government department.
When deciding on a legal form of organization, you should ask yourself all of the following questions except how many employees will you hire.
Therefore, C is the correct option.
Learn more about the organization here:
brainly.com/question/12825206
#SPJ1
Answer:
8.32%
Explanation:
The computation of cost reduction improve the ROE is shown below:-
For computing the increase in ROE first we need to follow some steps which is here below:-
Debt = capital × Debt
= $250,000 × 37.5%
= $93,750
Equity = Assets - Debt
= $250,000 - $93,750
= $156,250
New ROE = New Net income ÷ Equity
= $33,000 ÷ $156,250
= 21.12%
Old ROE = Old Net income ÷ Equity
= $20,000 ÷ $156,250
= 12.8%
Increase in ROE = New ROE- Old ROE
= 21.12% - 12.8%
= 8.32%
Answer:
a.the court will find that the third party is a holder in due course and, despite the fact that TP has defrauded Choi, not require the third party to repay Choi
Explanation:
In the event where TP who sold a franchise to Choi decides to go out of business and transfers everything to a third. In a lawsuit the court will find that the third party is a holder in due course and, despite the fact that TP has defrauded Choi, not require the third party to repay Choi.
