The great myth of the First World War was that defense was all-powerful.
In the inter war years, a new myth appeared -- that the new technology
of the airplane and the tank would result in rapid and massive
breakthroughs on the battlefield, with the enemy being destroyed in
weeks.
They are similar because the bill of rights was not obligatory when it was made, the states didn't have to abide by it yet because the supreme court didn't decide so. The Arizona Article II was similar to it to make sure the state abides by it. They are different for the simple reason that there are parts that are not based on the bill of rights, like the bill of rights has things not found in it, but the essence is the same.
I don’t remember, but I know it was Christian, if that helps at all
Answer:
Common Law is the correct answer
Explanation:
It is called common law because it was common in all the royal courts across England. It originated from the practices of the courts of English kings after the Norman Conquest in 1066. The British system spread to English colonies and they maintain the common law system today. The common law system uses the reasoning which was derived from English legal system. Almost one third of world's population lives in the countries where common law is applied or in the territories where it is mixed with civil law.
