First box is EF.
Second box is segment congruence postulate.
Third box is segment additon postulate.
Fourth box is DF. For this one the last sentence basically gives you the answer.
Just so you know for the fourth I guessed on if it's DF lined or DF unlined. I made my educated guess on the fact that the last line doesn't have a line. I hope this helps, and please tell me if I got something wrong, or my explanation wasn't sufficent enough for you.
So let's start by guesstimating the slopes:
the green line has a slope close to -x, but more negative than that, possibly -2; the pink line has a slope close to +x, but higher towards +2.
Next let's look at the solution: the two lines intersect at the point (1, -1).
**you could just simple plug that x (1) into all the equations, but let's rule out answers anyway. ;)
A) is incorrect because the slopes of -1 and +1 are off from out predicted -2 and +2
B) is incorrect because of a similar reason, the slopes of +3 and +1 don't make any sense
C) Ooh, we do have a +2 and -2 for the slopes, and... violà! plug in 1 for the x's and we get -1 for the y in both equations
D) slopes are closer than in A and B, but plugging in 1 doesn't get us -1
So the correct answer is:
C) y = 2x - 3 and y = −2x + 1
You could multiply again by 2 or long multiply by 2
Subtract 350 from both sides then divide both sides by 25.
(c-350)/25 = h
