I agree with this statement because with media involved in his speech it would have less fact because media doesn't always have reliable information
That’s so true. Great question
Rhetorical fallacies, or fallacies of argument, don't allow for the open, two-way exchange of ideas upon which meaningful conversations depend. Instead, they distract the reader with various appeals instead of using sound reasoning.
Answer:
B. Hildy's
Explanation:
The possessive of the word, or name, is a possessive noun and the apostrophe always goes before the S, and after the last letter
Answer:
No, I don't think he's very trustworthy because throughout the story you can tell how out of it and demented he is.
Explanation:
I think he just told the story as he lived it, but it might not be what had happened. From the very beginning of the story, he tries to make a case for his sanity, but the story he tells completely undermines it and is at odds with his declarations of sanity. Throughout the story, he recalls the events that led him to murder the old man and then confess. According to the text it states, "'Villains!' I shrieked, 'dissemble no more! I admit the deed!— tear up the planks!—here, here!—it is the beating of his hideous heart!'"
