A decrease in aggregate demand will generate a decrease in real GDP and a decrease in<span> the price level in the short run.
When the aggregate demand is decreased, the total economic output made by a country will also decrease, which results in lower GDP amount.
The decrease in aggregate demand will also result in a lower price for the short run because it forced the sellers to lower its selling price in order to get rid of the products from their warehouse </span>
I don’t believe that government interventions
are sustainable over a long time.<span>
<span>Government interventions such as social welfares are in
reality good policies to aid deprived people sustain themselves for a short
period of time. Howeveri in order to entirely eradicate their poverty, they
have to ultimately get a decent job to maintain their own living, otherwise,
the Government just keep on spending and increases national debt over time.</span></span>
Answer:
Minimize the weighted average cost of capital (WACC).
Explanation:
The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is the interest rate at which a company leverages its activities. The WACC includes the cost of debt (i.e. bonds and loans) and equity (i.e. common stock and retained earnings). It is calculated by multiplying each capital source by its interest rate and then adding the results.
A company should try to have the lowest WACC possible, since a lower interest rate equals higher profits.
Strength is the primary component falls for each unswerving client and proprietary bread in swot analysis.
The strengths of an enterprise describe what an organization excels at and what separates it from the opposition: a robust brand, unswerving consumer base, a robust stability street, specific technology, and so on.
<h3>
What is a SWOT analysis?</h3>
SWOT is a form for strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.
The SWOT analysis helps you see however you stand in the marketplace, how you'll grow as a business and wherever you're vulnerable. This easy-to-use tool conjointly helps you establish your company’s opportunities and any threats it faces. The method takes account of each of the interior and external factors your company should navigate.
Strengths and weaknesses are typically internal to your organization, whereas opportunities and threats typically relate to external factors. For this reason, the SWOT Analysis is typically referred to as internal-external analysis and also the SWOT matrix is sometimes called an i.e. matrix.
To learn more about SWOT Analysis visit:
brainly.com/question/21306560
#SPJ4
Answer & Explanation:
(a) Cost of Eliminating 2 Pollution Units
Firm X 215
Firm Y 1250
Firm Z 180
As mentioned in the question:
Company Y has excessive pollution-discount charges, it thinks it is probably better off shopping for a permit from firm Z and a allow from company X, so that it doesn't need to reduce its very own pollutants emissions. At which of the following expenses is firm Z inclined to sell one among its lets in to company Y, however firm X is not? We'll take a look at all that follow within the listing beneath.
$90
$178
$186
$451
$529
To cover its own costs, X needs to receive $200 but Z needs only $150. That means Z would sell for $178 or $186, but X would not.
Firm Initial Pollution Permit Allocation Action
Firm X 2 d. sell one permit for $326
Firm Y 2 b. buy two permits for $326 each
Firm Z 2 d. sell one permit for $326
Firm Final Amount of Pollution Eliminate Cost of pollution reduction
Firm X 3 $415
Firm Y 0
Firm Z 3 $330
Proposed method Total cost of Eliminating 6 units of pollution (dollars)
Regulation $215 + $1250 + $180 = $1645
Tradable permits $415 + $326 x 2 + $330 = $1397
In this situation, it may be concluded that doing away with pollutants is greater high priced to society while the authorities regulates each company to dispose of a certain quantity of pollution than while it allocates pollution permits that can be sold and bought. The trade able permits variety may be decreased even in addition if you took the view that the $326 paid to X and Z from Y were used to offset their expenses. In that case the final number could be simply $745 - $652 = $93.
Hope the Answer Helps :)