Traditional morals the system of production of material wealth
Answer: All of the Above
Explanation:
The Clayton Act of 1914 was passed to curb unfair business practices as well as to protect the rights of labour.
Some practices that were prohibited when they led to less competition include,
- A firm acquiring a major percentage of the stocks of a competing firm because this could signify an amalgamation of efforts on the part of both firms and they could therefore have some control over Pricing.
-A director from one business sitting on the board of a competing firm because this could lead to cooperating or Corperate espionage.
- A buyer is forced to buy multiple products from a producer in order to get a desired product is expressly forbidden.
Under the condition that country X can manufacture cars more cheaply. An absolute advantage devours in a country if it makes good over alternative country and uses a smaller amount of wealth to yield that good. The result of a country’s natural legacy is the absolute advantage. Another example is extracting oil in Saudi Arabia is pretty much just a matter of drilling a hole. Generating oil in other countries can is essential substantial exploration and costly technologies for drilling and extraction if certainly they have any oil at all. The United States devours about the richest farmland in the world which manufacture it at ease to grow corn and wheat than in many other countries. Guatemala and Colombia partake environment particularly suitable for growing coffee. Chile and Zambia have about of the world’s richest copper mines. As some have claimed that geography is destiny. Chile will bargain copper and Guatemala will harvest coffee and they will trade. When each country has a product others necessity and it can be manufactured with fewer resources in one country over another then it is easy to visualize all parties do good from trade. Thinking about trade just in relations of geography and absolute advantage is incomplete. Trade actually happens because of comparative advantage.
Answer:
1. Increase in number of orchards
2. Increase in housing prices
Explanation:
1. What effect is the new diet likely to have on the number of apple orchards within 100 miles of New York City?
There is going to be increased demand for apples due to this new diet and this increase in demand is going to bring about a hike in the price for apples. This price increase would make business to be viable for these apple farmers. More people would want to own orchards just to make money out of the boom in apples. Because apple farming now seems to be more profitable than other activities. <u><em>So this would cause the number of apple orchards that are within 100 miles of new york city to increase.</em></u>
2. What effect is the diet likely to have on housing prices in New York City?
- There would be an increase in housing prices in New york city as farmers would rather be planting apples on these lands instead of sellng them to developers for building houses. There would be a decrease in the supply of housing in New york.
Answer:
The answer is option A) A peer-review board for alternative dispute resolution usually consists of: an equal number of employee representatives and management appointees
Explanation:
Alternative dispute resolution is an affordable, less time consuming and less formal way of settling workplace disputes. To achieve this feat, a peer review board is constituted.
A peer review board usually consists of employers and management appointees and it could be a voluntary decision on their art to participate.
The pool of individuals nominated to be part of the peer review board is considered objective and unbiased in their assessment of the issue to be resolved. They are also deemed skillful in the art of listening and arbitration.
