Assuming that the triangles are congruent, you can just look at the parts on each triangle to find the parts on the other triangle. The answers are yes, yes, and no. The triangles are obviously not drawn to scale, so just remember to never rely on it being so.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Part A - Where did Phillip make a mistake? Justify your answer using complete sentences.
Use order of operation (PEMDAS)
He should multiply 8 x 4 first
Part B - Solve the expression correctly in the space below.
(5 x 9) - 8 x 4
= 45 - 32
= 13
Part C - Use the same rules of order of operations to solve the expression (8-4) +9 x 3. Explain your steps as you solve it.
(8-4) + 9 x 3
Step 1: 4 + 9 x 3 (Subtract in the parenthesis first)
Step 2: 4 + 27 (Multiply 9 x 3)
Step 3: 31 (Add)
Answer:
QRS is isosceles
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
See attachment for complete question
From the attachment, we have the following parameters
Solving further, we have:
From the calculations;
<em>This means that: QRS is isosceles</em>
Assume $1000 at 4.9% semi-annually = <span>$1,049.60
Assume $1000 at 4.8% daily = </span><span> $1,049.17
Let's try a bigger number $50'000 </span>4.9% semi-annually<span> $52,480.01
</span> $50,000 4.8% daily = <span> $52,458.37
It's a wash, the question is how long will you be investing, that might make a difference. I calculated 12 Millions over 6 years and bank A would be the better choice. Semi-annual compounded at 4.9%</span>
