Answer: "Digital citizenship" is a new government program designed to develop b. the ability to participate in society online.
Explanation: "Digital citizenship" is a program developed by the government in response to the increasing value of technology and the growing use of Internet mainly among young people and adults. "D<u>igital citizenship" gives people more tools for them to learn how to use technology</u> in a more effective way and, at the same time, how <u>to participate in society and establish a link with other citizens through the Internet.</u>
The different characteristics of democracy are related to the types of democracy that currently exist.
These types and their characteristics are:
Direct democracy: This democracy allows all citizens of a region to participate directly in the establishment of policies. This type of democracy was exercised in Athens and allowed any citizen (women and slaves not to be considered) to be able to present a bill, in addition to voting on the bills presented. Not only that, citizens could also participate directly in the region's legislative and executive power.
Representative democracy: It is the type of democracy used in republican and parliamentary countries. it is the most common type today and allows citizens to participate in the formation of policies indirectly, through the choice of their representatives, through the election of those who form the legislative and executive power.
Participatory democracy: It can be considered a semi-direct democracy. This is because it allows citizens to vote for their representatives, but it also allows citizens to participate directly in their country's governmental decisions.
Answer:
climate of trust
Explanation:
The problem with the team is that there is no climate of trust between each other. For progress and success, cooperation is necessary, and this requires a relationship of trust between the members. What they lack is collaboration and trust, since the environment reads hostile and bad, because they are always speaking badly and Araceli herself cannot speak for fear of being criticized.
Being a barb purrrrrrrrrrrrr...
This is a case in which apparently students can appeal to the fulfillment of the First Amendment that states the Freedom of Speech but I think that we have to remember that in any case our rights finish when we interfere with other peoples's rights.
I believe that schools, teachers and parents must get an agreement about what is good and bad for students because they are not mature enough to decide by themselves.
In the case Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier the supreme court rules in favor of the school board and make the difference between a private forum and a public forum stating that a school is a private forum.
Imagine that students were allowed to do whatever they want and present whatever play they wish then the school would have no rules and when a place has no rules it becomes jungle law
