Answer:
B. Suleyman the Magnificent led the Ottoman Turks to the height of power
Explanation:
Suleyman the Magnificent is the most respected and admired Ottoman ruler by the Turkish people. The reason for this is that Suleyman the Magnificent managed to bring the empire to the height of power. He was a very well educated man, and also he was very wise. He loved the arts and the craftsmanship, so he initiated the development of the arts in the empire. Suleyman had military successes too, and he was a very good military tactician, managing to further expand the territory in the Balkan Peninsula, defeating the Serbians and capturing Belgrade. Suleyman is also well respected because he was responsible for cultural development of the empire.
<em>Tuvia Bielski led a group of Jewish partisans who hid in the forest. ... In 1944, Asael Bielski was conscripted into the Soviet Army and killed in battle in Germany.</em>
<em>Mark as brainliest please.</em>
(Try to summarize this)
We can immediately think of different features: styles in art, architecture and music; different writing scripts; a distinct literature; a particular set of religious beliefs; noteworthy forms of government; special practices – for example, gladiators (Rome), caste (India) and so on. And of course, all civilizations occur at a particular time and place in world history.
For example, you will all know which civilization I am talking about when I mention pyramids, mummies, hieroglyphs and pharaohs. Ancient Egypt, of course.
Nothing I’ve said above, however, is quite as it seems. Taking Ancient Egypt as an example, the Egyptians only built pyramids at one phase of their history. Hieroglyphs were not used in everyday life. Sometimes the land of Ancient Egypt was ruled by foreigners, not native pharaohs. Their religious beliefs changed over time. And yes, they certainly embalmed bodies – but so did many other ancient peoples.
Other civilizations changed much more drastically. The ancient Romans began their history under the rule of kings, before changing to a republic, and then an empire. They spent much of their history as pagans, but later converted to Christianity. In their early days they built Greek-style temples; by the end they were building great domed cathedrals. They even ended up in an entirely different location: starting out in central Italy, the last people who considered themselves “Romans” died defending a city in what is today Turkey.
All civilizations show these sorts of changes, to a lesser or greater extent, and yet, most of us know what is meant when we hear the phrase “Ancient Egyptian civilization” or “Ancient Roman civilization”.
Of course, as historians (professional and amateur), we expect all civilizations to change over time: they grow and spread, their cultures evolve, their political systems change. But what is really interesting (for me, at any rate) is, when one civilization changes into another.
This issue lies behind such questions as: when did the ancient civilizations of Egypt and Mesopotamia come to an end? What exactly happened to the civilizations of ancient Greece and Rome? Can the civilization of China be truly regarded as a single, long-enduring civilization, or do the outward continuities mask one or more break-points?
How does a civilization, which over the course of centuries or millennia has been gradually changing, change so drastically that it can no longer be regarded as the same civilization?
In a series of blog posts I’m going to look at this matter with regard to particular civilizations.
The answers are 1,4,5 or A,D,E
<u>1</u>.Holding a yearly drawing
<u>4.</u>Using the color black to indicate the unlucky winner
5. Sacrificing people from town every year
<u>Hope this helps! <3</u>
