1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Cloud [144]
3 years ago
15

In the 1960s, new evidence helped support the theory of continental drift and change it into the theory of plate tectonics. What

was this new evidence?
Rock patterns and glacial deposits in similar climates.
The African and South American coastlines are similar, providing evidence of their common origin.
Fossils disproving the continent of Pangaea.
The location of the plates was determined by locating their boundaries, using data on the Earth’s magnetic field.
Biology
2 answers:
kumpel [21]3 years ago
5 0

I would have to say the first option.

Due to the fact that Africa and South America do not have similar coasts, fossils prove that used to be the continent of Pangaea, and location of the plates had boundaries, but they were not affected by Earth's magnetic fields.

Angelina_Jolie [31]3 years ago
3 0
What they said ^^ ..!
You might be interested in
An atom that loses or gains electrons and ends up being positively or negatively charged is called
shepuryov [24]
This becomes an Ion.
3 0
3 years ago
What is an atom's atomic number?
vazorg [7]

Answer:

the number of protons in an atom

3 0
3 years ago
Why dont children look exactly like their parents?
Illusion [34]

Answer:

because parents only give the child 1/2 of their chromosomes

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Sloths have less muscle than other mammals their size in order to _______.
o-na [289]
A.
conserve energy

The smaller muscle mass of the sloth, means that it needs less energy to work, allowing it to be able to survive on a less diet.
Most of their muscles are concentrated in their upper body, allowing them to be efficient climbers but very slow on the ground.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the difference between primary dimensions of diversity and secondary dimensions of diversity?
Sveta_85 [38]

Answer:

A. Primary dimensions are less changeable, while secondary dimensions can change and are less visible.

Explanation:

The differences between primary and secondary dimension of diversity are as follows -

A) Primary Dimension

a) Primary dimension are those which are salient and hence they cannot change

b) Some common examples of primary dimensions are - ethnicity, sexual orientation, ethnicity,  gender, race, physical abilities/qualities, age etc.

A)  Secondary Dimension

a) Secondary dimension are not only limited to specific features and hence they can change with time.

b) Some common examples of secondary dimension are - geographic location, marital  status, parental status. work experiences, educational background, income,military experience, religious beliefs, etc.

Hence, option A is correct

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is not a key role of cell division?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following organisms would be grouped closest
    10·1 answer
  • The fact that little albert learned fear toward not only a white rat but also a ball of wool and a rabbit represents:
    8·1 answer
  • The increased use of wind turbines and solar collectors to generate electric power will
    13·1 answer
  • Why does the hydrosphere need the atmosphere?
    13·2 answers
  • If high temperatures are most effective at killing microbes, what statement correctly explains why some foods products are treat
    6·1 answer
  • What variables should the scientists control in the experiment
    7·1 answer
  • What is the product P?<br> A) Energy <br> B) Glucose <br> C) Hydrogen <br> D) Nitrogen
    15·2 answers
  • Do you know the different stages through which raw agricultural materials go before they reach your table? Trace the journey of
    7·2 answers
  • Are catabolic pathways endergonic or exergonic reactions? Compare the amount of free energy in the reactants to the amount of fr
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!