Answer:
The correct order is
1. High School Diploma, from High School.
2. The Associate in Arts (AA) in Mathematics from the Community College.
3. The Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering from College.
Answer:
This best illustrates the value of negative reinforcement.
Explanation:
Negative reinforcement refers to removing an aversive stimulus. For example, in the given scenario, the father put the movie in to get rid of the constant crying and whining of the son. He did not do so out of love or any other positive emotion. We, as humans, practice negative reinforcement multiple times to cope up with certain situations. The idea is more common among parents with young children.
In assessing the internal validity of an intervention, we try to determine if certain changes cause certain outcomes. It is relevant in studies that try to establish casual relationship. While in observational or descriptive studies, it is not that relevant. It is also possible to have internal validity in a study and not have construct validity. Example, imagine a study where you are looking at the effects of a new computerized tutoring program on math performance in first grade students.
<u>Bottom-up estimating technique</u> decomposes the work into lower, more detailed pieces.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Bottom-up estimating is the process of the estimation of work at the lowest possible level of detail. The estimates are accumulated to get the summary totals. The probability of achieving the estimated amount can be improved by building detailed cost and time estimates for a work package.
Bottom-up estimating is the project managing tool followed by many of the firms to estimate the cost and duration of project tasks. The bottom-up estimation consumes more time.
Explanation:
The Islamic State (ISIS) is in sharp decline, but in its rout lie important lessons and lingering threats. This is true for the four countries of the Maghreb covered in this report, Algeria, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia, which constitute a microcosm of ISIS’ identity, trajectory and shifting fortunes to date. Those countries possess two unwanted claims to fame: as a significant pool of ISIS foreign fighters and, in the case of Libya, as the site of ISIS’ first successful territorial conquest outside of Iraq and Syria. The pool is drying up, to a point, and the caliphate’s Libyan province is no more. But many factors that enabled ISIS’s ascent persist. While explaining the reasons for ISIS’ performance in different theatres is inexact and risky science, there seems little question that ending Libya’s anarchy and fragmentation; improving states’ capacities to channel anger at elites’ predatory behaviour and provide responsive governance; treading carefully when seeking to regiment religious discourse; and improving regional and international counter-terrorism cooperation would go a long way toward ensuring that success against ISIS is more than a fleeting moment.
Its operations in the Maghreb showcase ISIS’s three principal functions: as a recruitment agency for militants willing to fight for its caliphate in Iraq and Syria; as a terrorist group mounting bloody attacks against civilians; and as a military organisation seeking to exert territorial control and governance functions. In this sense, and while ISIS does not consider the Maghreb its main arena for any of those three forms of activity, how it performed in the region, and how states reacted to its rise, tells us a lot about the organisation.
