Answer:
based on the goal that delegate George Mason set for ... among delegates, and the ratification and amendment process. Finally, he offers them ... and must be allowed to meet, face to face, with the witnesses against him.
Explanation:The name George Mason is not one that many Americans outside our region would ... As a delegate to the Constitutional Convention, Mason refused to sign the Constitution and lobbied against its ratification in his home state, ... reluctance to deal more harshly with the institution of slavery (although he himself held slaves)
Answer:
The Framers of the Constitution created a representative democracy that represents the will of people at the national, state, and regional levels.
Explanation:
Representative democracy is effective in the case of the United States where a single elected official reflects the will of a large number of citizens. In the US, only two senators represent the desire of all the residents in their states. Countries with democratic democracy save time and resources by holding a small number of government elections, which can then be dedicated to other public services. And if the representatives fail up to the aspiration of people they can be changed in the next elections.
Answer:
This said tribe is likely considered to be a hunter gatherer tribe because of the traits it shares with those of typical hunter gatherer tribes.
Explanation:
Answer:
stereotypes
Explanation:
Stereotype: In social psychology, the term stereotype is described as an individual's "over-generalized belief" about a specific category of individuals. It is often considered as an exception that one person possesses for another person.
Gender stereotype: A gender stereotype is an individual's tendency to hold an over-generalized view towards specific people with a particular gender.
In the question above, Ronald is demonstrating that he holds very deep gender stereotypes.
Answer:
Reactance.
Explanation:
This is simply explained the juror's motives and doings which directly tells that inadmissible evidence violates due process, and legal evidentiary standards dictate that a curative instruction is appropriate to minimize the risk that the jury is misled by the unacceptable information.
Psychologists posit that jurors are likely to follow the prescribed corrective action only if motivated and able to do so. Research shows that jurors do attempt to use information in a fair manner and to align their decisions with the judge’s instructions. However, juror motivation also may be affected by reactance resistance to a judge’s admonition when it is seen as constraining effective deliberation unless the judge can offer a clear and compelling reason as to why the information is unreliable or irrelevant to the case. Jurors may resist giving up information that they find probative.
