All categories

3 years ago

Please help me 19 points for whoever answers number 3

Mathematics

2 answers:

Nastasia [14]3 years ago

7 0

15%

amount error is guess subtract actual amount 198-172 = 26
26/172 = 0.15
0.15 x100 = 15%

Anuta_ua [19.1K]3 years ago

7 0

15% the person above is correct

You might be interested in

Simplify the expression below. (–7x + 4) – (2x – 8)

Elanso [62]

Answer:

- 9x + 12

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

(- 7x + 4) - (2x - 8) ← distribute parenthesis by 1 and - 1

= - 7x + 4 - 2x + 8 ← collect like terms

= - 9x + 12

5 0

3 years ago

3.(8 points)Consider the following experiment:Experiment: A bag contains 3 red balls, 4 blue balls, 4 green balls and 3yellow ba

MakcuM [25]

Answer:

3 / 91

Step-by-step explanation:

Given :

Red balls = 3

Blue balls = 4

Green balls = 4

Yellow balls = 3

Total number of balls = (3+4+4+3) = 14

Sample space :

RR, BB, GG, YY, RB, BR, BG, GB, YG, GY, YR, RY, BY, YB, GR, RG

Probability of drawing two red balls without replacement :

1st draw :

P(red) = number of red balls / total number of balls

P(red) = 3/14

2nd draw :

P(red) = 2 / 13

Hence,

P(RR) = 3/14 * 2/13 = 6 / 182 = 3 / 91

5 0

3 years ago

A backpacking tent in the shape of a triangular prism has sides that are 6 ft and a length of 7 ft. What is the volume of the te

Zanzabum

<span>the volume of the tent to the nearest whole number is 109.</span>

3 0

3 years ago

Catalina multiplied 842 and 3 and got 3,326. how can can she check to see if her answer is reasonable

denpristay [2]

By rounding 842 to 800, she can multiply 800 by 3 to get 2,400.

then, multiply 40 by 3, you get 120 and add the two together to get 2,520

this shows her answer is not necessary reasonable

4 0

2 years ago

Examine this system of equations. What integer should the second equation be multiplied by so that when the two equations are ad

Zepler [3.9K]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

we should multiply the 1/8 on the 2nd equation, by some number "n", such that our result will be equals to -3/4, namely the above x-coefficient but negative, or different sign, so (rest of the explanation is in the picture attached)

3 0

3 years ago