Answer:
(D) I think
Step-by-step explanation:
Lets look at our answer choices; A.
The intervals are not comparable. The shorter bar spans more than 10 years. When it comes to a horizontal axis it doesn't matter how far it expands,just if it's expanded correctly.
B.The intervals are appropriately labeled. There not it goes from 25 to 50 in just in instant few climbs up.
C.The intervals are not comparable, but the data on the graph is not misleading. It is misleading the graphs are incorrectly labeled.
Which brings us to our answer D.The vertical axis does not have an appropriate scale. it goes from 0-25 25-50 and 50-75 then 75-100. that's a short distance for such numbers that are pretty far apart.
I hope I'm right and I hope this helps:)!
Outcome Bag of Gold Magic Wand
Relative frequency 0.32 0.68
The relative frequency of getting a bag of gold is .......... reasonably close
.32 is close to 30% so
Alison's claim about the theoretical probability is likely to be 2............true
Further, this means that the theoretical probability of getting a magic wand is most likely 3............1 - 30% = 70%
All you would do is divide 9.99/15 to get how much one pound costs.
The answer would be around 66 or 67 cents.
9.99/15=.666
Hello :
f(6) =2(6)² +<span>√(6-2) = 72 +2 =74</span>
Answer:
1.71 × 10^8 gallons
Step-by-step explanation:
1.9 × 10^7 = 19,000,000
19,000,000 × 9 = 171,000,000
171,000,000 in scientific notation is 1.71 × 10^8
