Answer:
<em>I can see that there are no choices.</em>
fallacy of bandwagon
Explanation:
A "logical fallacy" refers to the error of reasoning or logical gap that makes an argument invalid.
The situation above commits the fallacy of the bandwagon because the argument is being supported only according to a significant number of population. This is a fallacy because it doesn't necessarily mean all of the retired persons are unhappy about the level of Social Security assistance due to the opinion of 30 persons who agreed that they were unhappy. It becomes a "standalone justification" of the validity of an argument. We cannot judge the happiness or unhappiness of all retired persons according only to a group of 30 persons <em>(even though they were chosen from different parts of the country). </em>
So, this explains the answer.
An effective way to manage the situation is by having to set
the difference in the status aside because by doing this, both parties are
equal and are free to talk regarding the issue without having to be limited
just because the other is likely to have a higher in status and by doing so,
the conflict may be resolved easily.
The answer is the stand-alone code
Answer:
It, would be for mispellings on the PDF document.
Explanation:
Answer:
Colonists who were too far away to fight, or embraced the beliefs of both parties were referred to as neutralists. They made up the remaining one third of American colonists during the revolution. Neutrals, or neutralists, didn't partake in the battles that their patriot and loyalist brethren often fought.
Explanation:
