Explanation:
Hammurabi was quite harsh when it came to his code of law. Although the punishments as well as the limits were reasonable, the cruelity was demonstrated throughout the code of law. However, the most unfair and unreasonable laws, in my opinion, consisted of long-term suffering. For example, if a physician accidently failed an operation and tragically killed his patient, Hammurabi would lacerate the physician's hands, ensuring that that physician will not make the same terrible mistake again. These laws were not merciful whatsoever, but Hammurabi's punishments and limits that he set in his kingdom kept things in order. After all, the empire did fall apart after Hammurabi's death.
A theodicy for some given fact about evil is an explanation for why God would have an all‐things‐considered sufficient reason to allow that evil. The counterpart theodicy relies on a metaphysical claim about existence. We cannot know what "good" is unless there is "evil" to contrast it with. (1) Doesn't justify all kinds of evil (Do we need genocide to know what goodness is?), (2) Doesn't justify the amount of evil (Do we need so much killing/theft to know what goodness is?), (3) God can know good/evil prior to creation/evil.
The Enlightenment idea is best reflected in this excerpt is the social contract
- Social contract is simply known as a form of an agreement by which people state and limit their individual rights, thereby creating an organized society or government.
- The excerpt above is based on John Locke idea of social contract.
Conclusively, we can say that the enlightenment idea is best reflected in this excerpt is the social contract
Learn more from
brainly.com/question/17449623
Ivan the terrible didn't like new things coming in his country he was totalitarian
