Answer:
a)what was concluded is spurious
b) what was concluded could betrue
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Considering the number in Michigan, there is higher number of crimes but considering the population in Minnesota, the population is much less than Michigan, considering the crime the crimes per capital with the population size, Therefore Minnesota could have more crimes than Michigan's so, The conclusion is not true.
b)There is reduction of crimes from 1991 to 2001, so it can be assumed that the population has increased over the times, therefore, the per capita number of crimes decreased.
Answer:
weed ,led ,we, tee , tweedle
Answer:
just go in your browser and use m a t h w a y no spaces and should be the first one
Step-by-step explanation:
Give me more points, and I will ;)
