Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Campus authorites are allowed to search lockers because anything brought on campus or that belongs to the school there allowed to search
Biden would offer superior leadership.
Biden has spent almost his entire adult life in elective office, and in his Senate career acquired a reputation as a dealmaker and foreign policy expert. He is a supporter of common-sense gun control and environmental protections. He listens to the advice of scientists on matters of public health. As vice president under Barack Obama, he managed the 2009 economic recovery package — an experience that, sadly, will be relevant in 2021. His victory in the Democratic primaries was built on support from Black voters, demonstrating an ability to build coalitions across racial lines that will be of critical importance in a starkly divided nation that must address the sins of its past. Biden has already made history by choosing as his running mate Senator Kamala Harris, a fierce defender of civil rights and LGBTQ rights and the nation’s first Black and Asian-American woman to be a major party’s vice presidential nominee. Biden has the chance to be a transformative president, expanding health care access, preventing climate catastrophe and cleaning up our air and water, and protecting voting rights. But Joe Biden doesn’t need Congress at all for the most important job before him: to make the presidency great again.
Answer:
Four basic responsibilities of police officers?
1. Enforce laws
2. Provide services
3. Prevent Crimes
4. Preserve the peace
In the public mind, what is the primary role of the police?
to enforce society's laws
Law Enforcement Officer
- "crime fighters"
- clear mandate to seek out and apprehend those who have violated the law.
Another word for "crime fighters"?
"crook catchers"
Who found that officers spent only about half of their time enforcing the law or dealing with crimes?
- Jack Greene
- Carl Klockars
What shows that most arrests are made for "crimes of disorder" rather than violent or property crimes?
Uniformed Crime Report or UCR
<h2 /><h2 /><h2>
<em><u>HOPE</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>IT</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>HELPS</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>YOU</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em></h2>
The criminal justice data analysis tools that have been linked in the module resources.
- Corrections Statistical Analysis Tool (CSAT)
- National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) Dashboard (N-DASH) Tool
<h3>What type(s) of crime seem to be increasing and decreasing?</h3>
The Unequal right crimes are increasing as well as hate crime while the declining rate in cracking cocaine.
Corrections Statistical Analysis Tool (CSAT) is known to be used inn private facilities as well as in local jails, imprisonment rate, citizenship status, and others.
National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) Dashboard (N-DASH) Tool boast the speed of carrying out analyses, has new data elements, and helps makes custom graphics and others.
Therefore, The criminal justice data analysis tools that have been linked in the module resources.
- Corrections Statistical Analysis Tool (CSAT)
- National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) Dashboard (N-DASH) Tool
Learn more about data analysis from
brainly.com/question/23810306
#SPJ1
In several Supreme Court decisions this decade, the question of whether a constitutional attack on a statute should be considered “as applied” to the actual facts of the case before the Court or “on the face” of the statute has been a difficult preliminary issue for the Court. The issue has prompted abundant academic discussion. Recently, scholars have noted a preference within the Roberts Court for as-applied constitutional challenges. However, the cases cited as evidence for the Roberts Court’s preference for as-applied challenges all involve constitutional challenges which concede the legislative power to enact the provision but nevertheless argue for unconstitutionality because the statute intrudes upon rights or liberties protected by the Constitution. Of course, this is not the only type of constitutional challenge to a statute; some constitutional challenges attack the underlying power of the legislative branch to pass the statute in question. Modern scholarship, however, as well as the Supreme Court, has mostly ignored the difference between these two different types of constitutional challenges to statutes when discussing facial and as-applied constitutional challenges. In glossing over this difference, considerations which fundamentally affect whether a facial or as-applied challenge is appropriate have gone unnoticed. By clearly distinguishing between these two very different types of constitutional challenges, and the respective role of a federal court in adjudicating each of these challenges, a new perspective can be gained on the exceedingly difficult question of when a facial or as-applied challenge to a statute is appropriate. In this Article, I argue that federal courts are constitutionally compelled to consider the constitutionality of a statute on its face when the power of Congress to pass the law has been challenged. Under the separation of powers principles enunciated in I.N.S. v. Chadha and Clinton v. New York, federal courts are not free to ignore the “finely wrought” procedures described in the Constitution for the creation of federal law by “picking and choosing” constitutional applications from unconstitutional applications of the federal statute, at least when the statute has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s enumerated powers in the Constitution. The separation of powers principles of I.N.S. and Clinton, which preclude a “legislative veto” or an executive “line item veto,” should similarly preclude a “judicial application veto” of a law that has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s Constitutional authority.
