B. It becomes more stable and will have a -2 charge.
Answer:
a) 99.93%
b) 99.98%
Explanation:
Given that:
Total population size was only around 18 individuals ( for black-footed ferret)
If the annual survival rate in the wild was 0.4%.
a)
What is the probability that all 18 would have died in a single year?
To find that; we multiply the annual survival rate in the wild with the total population; which is:
(0.4%×18) = 0.072%
Then; we subtract it from a total of 100% in order to determine the probability that all 18 would have died in a single year.
= (100.00% - 0.072%)
= 99.93%
b)
What is the probability that all 18 would have died in a single year if canine distemper was present?
Given that;
Because of the presence of canine distemper disease, the annual mortality rate might have been as high as 0.89.
To determine the probability; we have:
1 - Annual mortality rate = annual survival rate
1 - 0.89 = 0.11 %
Therefore, 0.11% of 18 individuals = (0.0011 × 18)
= 0.0198%
Probability that all 18 would have died in a single year if canine distemper was present = 100 - probability of annual survival rate
= (100 - 0.0198)%
= 99.98%
The two bacteria are considered to be anaerobic endospore-formers that deliver neurotoxins. Disease comes about when the endospores are brought profound into the tissues. The two neurotoxins meddle with engine control. Botulism poison, delivered by C. botulinum, ties the cytoplasmic films of engine neurons at the neurotransmitter and keeps the arrival of acetylcholine neurotransmitter and, subsequently, forestalls motioning to muscle cells. At the point when muscle cells don't get signals from engine neurons, they stay loose, bringing about a flabby loss of motion. The absence of engine control delivers a not insignificant rundown of side effects, the most genuine of which is a respiratory disappointment, on the grounds that respiratory muscles can be influenced by botulism poison.
Hi the powerful abductor muscle of the upper arm is the deltoid.
Hope this helps you.
Answer:
La globalización hace más vulnerable la economía al cambio climático. La susceptibilidad de la red económica global al estrés por calor de los trabajadores se ha duplicado en la última década, según concluye un nuevo estudio publicado en la revista 'Science Avances'
Explanation:
