1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bogdan [553]
3 years ago
12

What value of z is a solution to this equation? 19+z=25 z = 6 or z = 7

Mathematics
2 answers:
Fittoniya [83]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

z=6

Step-by-step explanation:

25-19=6

19+6=25

nekit [7.7K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

z = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

19 + 6 = 25

Hope this helps.

You might be interested in
Can I get some help please?
Travka [436]

Answer and Step-by-step explanation:

A) The first three terms are:

5, 8, 11

B) The tenth term is 32

You find the answer by plugging in the value for n. So for A), you would plug in 1, 2, and 3 (the first 3 terms), then to find the tenth term, you plug in 10 for n.

<em><u>#teamtrees #PAW (Plant And Water)</u></em>

3 0
3 years ago
"Immediately after a ban on using hand-held cell phones while driving was implemented, compliance with the law was measured. A r
sergiy2304 [10]

Answer:

(a) Null Hypothesis, H_0 : p_1-p_2=0  or  p_1= p_2  

    Alternate Hypothesis, H_A : p_1-p_2\neq 0  or  p_1\neq p_2

(b) We conclude that there is a statistical difference in these two proportions measured initially and then one year later.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a random sample of 1,250 drivers found that 98.9% were in compliance. A year after the implementation, compliance was again measured to see if compliance was the same (or not) as previously measured.

A different random sample of 1,100 drivers found 96.9% compliance."

<em />

<em>Let </em>p_1<em> = proportion of drivers that were in compliance initially</em>

p_2<em> = proportion of drivers that were in compliance one year later</em>

(a) <u>Null Hypothesis</u>, H_0 : p_1-p_2=0  or  p_1= p_2      {means that there is not any statistical difference in these two proportions measured initially and then one year later}

<u>Alternate Hypothesis</u>, H_A : p_1-p_2\neq 0  or  p_1\neq p_2     {means that there is a statistical difference in these two proportions measured initially and then one year later}

The test statistics that will be used here is <u>Two-sample z proportion statistics</u>;

                     T.S.  = \frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{ \frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1} + \frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2}} }  ~ N(0,1)

where, \hat p_1 = sample proportion of drivers in compliance initially = 98.9%

\hat p_2 = sample proportion of drivers in compliance one year later = 96.9%

n_1 = sample of drivers initially = 1,250

n_2 = sample of drivers one year later = 1,100

(b) So, <u><em>the test statistics</em></u>  =  \frac{(0.989-0.969)-(0)}{\sqrt{ \frac{0.989(1-0.989)}{1,250} + \frac{0.969(1-0.969)}{1,100}} }  

                                           =  3.33

<u>Now, P-value of the test statistics is given by;</u>

         P-value = P(Z > 3.33) = 1 - P(Z \leq 3.33)

                                            = 1 - 0.99957 = <u>0.00043</u>

Since in the question we are not given with the level of significance so we assume it to be 5%. Now at 5% significance level, the z table gives critical values between -1.96 and 1.96 for two-tailed test.

<em>Since our test statistics does not lies within the range of critical values of z, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which </em><u><em>we reject our null hypothesis.</em></u>

Therefore, we conclude that there is a statistical difference in these two proportions measured initially and then one year later.

7 0
3 years ago
True or false the reciprocal of 5 is 1/5<br>シ​
rodikova [14]

Answer:

True

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do you find the lateral area of a pentagonal prism?
Sloan [31]
AL=5ah!!!!!!!!!! Hope it helps
3 0
3 years ago
F(x)=lx+4l+3 how do u do it
dybincka [34]

Answer:

implifying

f(x) = lx + 4l + -3

Multiply f * x

fx = lx + 4l + -3

Reorder the terms:

fx = -3 + 4l + lx

Solving

fx = -3 + 4l + lx

Solving for variable 'f'.

Move all terms containing f to the left, all other terms to the right.

Divide each side by 'x'.

f = -3x-1 + 4lx-1 + l

Simplifying

f = -3x-1 + 4lx-1 + l

Reorder the terms:

f = l + 4lx-1 + -3x-1

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The conditional relative frequency table was generated using data that compares the number of boys and girls who pack their lunc
    15·2 answers
  • Slope of 2/5 that passes through (10,-4)
    9·2 answers
  • In the year 2000, the average cost of a computer could be modeled by the equation C = -5t2 + 750, where t is the number of years
    6·1 answer
  • The table below shows how much money a grocery store receives for selling different amounts of asparagus.
    8·1 answer
  • What is the value of x? sin(x+34)°=cos(2x+20)° Enter your answer in the box. x =
    7·1 answer
  • Please help homework
    12·2 answers
  • What is the answer to (3-4i)(5+6i)
    8·2 answers
  • The diameter of a circle is 10 cm. Find its area in terms of π.
    12·2 answers
  • you deposit $2000 in an account earning 6% interest compounded continuously. How much will you have in the account in 15 years?
    9·1 answer
  • A barn is shaped like a rectangular prism with a triangular prism on top as shown. The exterior four walls and two triangular fa
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!