Answer: A barter system is an old method of exchange. Th is system has been used for centuries and long before money was invented. People exchanged services and goods for other services and goods in return. ... The value of bartering items can be negotiated with the other party. And community is a group of people living in the same place or having a particular characteristic in common.
Hopes it help can u pls mark me as brainliest
Explanation:
I don’t know why it was so successful at that
Answer:
Argentine culture is different from south american culture because it has many more european immigrants than other countries. This is because argentina has many more european immigrants than other countries. This is partially due to the fact that many nazis came here to escape prosection. But other than that they have a lot of italian and spanish immigrants as well.
Explanation:
Answer: Freedom of speech, religion, to bear arms, and tp vote. No options included, but these are the ones that are given to you as an American citizen in the first amendment.
Answer:
a. certain types of cancers take twenty to thirty years to develop, and cell phone studies have only been monitoring this potential connection for ten years or less.
Explanation:
<u>This statement explains how we can't for the sure claim there are more benefits off the cell phone because the studies of the health effects have not been going on for long enough for us to prove that.</u>
<u>The damage is yet to be revealed, as stated in the claim, but it can be of great influence if proven that cell phones are connected to the development of cancer.</u>
<u>The B statement</u> does not add anything to the first claim and does not contradict it, as it just gives information about phone history usage and not the health benefits or risks.
<u>The C statement </u>is not counterclaiming as it adds up to the mentioned benefits - it explains how cell phones are helping life in general and do not refer to the statement about health risks.
<u>The D statement </u>mentions claims by agencies that are not health-based, and also supports the first statement, saying how there are no links to cancer development so far. It actually only goes with the original statement, and the A statement is counterclaim for it as well.
