The answer to the question is 1889 however it did not go smoothly
Corruption in the health infrastructure leads to the more spread and damaged of this virus.
The ebola crisis of 2013-2016 could have been prevented if corruption in local governments had been corrected because corruption in health infrastructure led to the spread of elbola disease. Difficulty occurs in the containment of ebola outbreak due to weak surveillance systems and poor public health infrastructure.
It quickly spread to Guinea's bordering countries, Liberia and Sierra Leone due to poor containment facilities which leads to more death casualties. If there is no corruption in the public health infrastructure this ebola crises can be prevented so we can conclude that corruption in the health infrastructure led to the more spread and damaged of this virus.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/25794937
Answer:
World war 1 began in 1914 after the assassination of archduke Franz Ferdinand, the war ended in 1918. During the war Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria and the Ottoman Empire fall against Great Britain, France, Russia, Italy, Romania, Japan and the United State. mainly Britain, France, and US won World War 1 Germany was the main Loser along with Australia- Hungary , the Ottoman Empire, and the other Central Powers and also Russia although Russia withdrew from the war early due to Civil War issues at home. Germany had formally surrendered on November 11th in 1918 and All Nations had agreed to stop fighting while the terms of Peace were negotiated . on June 28th 1919 Germany and the Allied Nations including Britain, France, Italy and Russia signed the Treaty of Versallies, formerly ending the war.
Explanation:
One of the most important rules to the Native Americans was that land was to be used by tribes regardless of whether or not it was "worked" in the traditional European sense. This led to great conflict with the Europeans, who thought the Natives weren't entitled to the land if they did farm on it.
Answer:
He argued that by unleashing competition, free trade was likely to drive down workers' wages
Explanation:
Marx also disputed the argument that free trade facilitated a natural division of labour between countries. The free traders failed to understand that "one country can grow rich at the expense of another
