Answer:
The correct answer is designing the survey so that subjects are not forced to answer one question before going to the next.
Explanation:
When talking about an investigation of sensitive and controversial issues, the investigator has to have the tact to obtain the necessary information from the participants, whereby so that you can use different strategies.
In this case, giving the option to pass the question to the participant if he does not feel ready to answer it allows him to return to it if he is prepared at some time while answering the survey. So the researcher can be sure that the information does not is biased.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
It started when the patriarch of Constantinople and partiarch of Rome excommunicated each other.
Integrity vs despair is the eighth and last stage of Erik Erikson's scenic theory of psychosocial development that includes evaluation of life and choices in everything that has been done, in things enjoyed, in failed plans, etc.
Erikson's theory proposes that individuals go through eight distinctive phases of development as they progress and change through life.
- In the integrity vs despair stage, the conflict focuses on debating whether or not the individual has led a good life.
- People review the life they have led and come away with a sense of realization in a life well lived or a sense of disappointment at a life wasted.
Therefore, we can conclude that the last stage of Erik Erikson's Theory of Psychosocial Development is integrity vs despair that appears from late adulthood, and until death.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/12538636
Middle adulthood is <span> A contemporary phenomenon, basically nonexistent before the twentieth century.
What considered as 'acceptable' for middle adulthood vary from one culture to another. Before the twentieth century, someone already considerd as 'adults' after they're about 15 years old, so this term did not exist back at that time.</span>
