How can scientific conclusions be reliable, but also able to be changed with the introduction of new evidence

Biology

1 answer:

aleksklad [387]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

scientific conclusions are reliable as they are helpful for many things however it is true that after the evolution of new ideas the old theory have some changes or may change fully or may be proved wrong but yeah the old theories are still helpful for many reasons and things.

so I think scientific conclusions are reliable

You might be interested in

The researchers also found that after 150 days, the relative change in virulence of B. thuringiensis was greater than the relati

Debora [2.8K]

Answer: pathogen–host coevolution

Explanation:

A major driver of evolution is Reciprocal coevolution between host and pathogen. Rather than pathogen, one-sided adaptation to a nonchanging host, high virulence specifically favoured during pathogen–host coevolution. In all of the independent replicate populations under coevolution, the pathogen ( B. thuringiensis ) genotype BT-679 with known nematocidal toxin genes of C. elegans and high virulence specifically swept to fixation but only some of them go under one-sided adaptation,

so relative change in B. thuringiensis virulence was greater than the relative change in C. elegans resistance is due to the elevated copy numbers of the plasmid containing the nematocidal toxin genes .

7 0

3 years ago

True of false: The wings on an airplane are flat.<br> 1. False<br> 2. True

makkiz [27]

Answer: True

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Which best decrides mixtures

Strike441 [17]

Answer:

2 or more substances or ingredients coming together to create one.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

How many nucleotides are there in a codon?

cestrela7 [59]

Answer:

three

Explanation:

Each codon consists of <em>three nucleotides</em>, usually corresponding to a single amino acid. The nucleotides are abbreviated with the letters A, U, G and C.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why a plant which is left in the dark for a long period of time will test negative for starch?

Zanzabum

When a plant is left in dark for several hours, it does not get sunlight. Isn't it?
When a plant does not get sunlight, it cannot prepare food for itself , i.e, photosynthesis does not take place. When it does not prepare food in the form of starch, it will test negative for it.

hope it helps!

3 0

3 years ago