If <em>c</em> > 0, then <em>f(x</em> - <em>c)</em> is a shift of <em>f(x)</em> by <em>c</em> units to the right, and <em>f(x</em> + <em>c)</em> is a shift by <em>c</em> units to the left.
If <em>d</em> > 0, then <em>f(x)</em> - <em>d</em> is a shift by <em>d</em> units downward, and <em>f(x)</em> + <em>d</em> is a shift by <em>d</em> units upward.
Let <em>g(x)</em> = <em>x</em>. Then <em>f(x)</em> = <em>g(x</em> + <em>a)</em> - <em>b</em> = (<em>x</em> + <em>a</em>) - <em>b</em>. So to get <em>g(x)</em>, we translate <em>f(x)</em> to the left by <em>a</em> units, and down by <em>b</em> units.
Note that we can also interpret the translation as
• a shift upward of <em>a</em> - <em>b</em> units, since
(<em>x</em> + <em>a</em>) - <em>b</em> = <em>x</em> + (<em>a</em> - <em>b</em>)
• a shift <em>b</em> units to the right and <em>a</em> units upward, since
(<em>x</em> + <em>a</em>) - <em>b</em> = <em>x</em> + (<em>a</em> - <em>b</em>) = <em>x</em> + (- <em>b</em> + <em>a</em>) = (<em>x</em> - <em>b</em>) + <em>a</em>.
I think the answer is G.
I think this because of the fact families (like my elementary teacher used to say)
It’s like about multiplication of fact families so make it where it would have fact families with those numbers as the sums.
I hope this helps! Be safe out there.
Answer:
This does not make sense.
Step-by-step explanation:
Just because you are a musician does not mean you play the guitar.
You can play the piano and a trumpet, but not be able to play a guitar!
Answer:
Picture of problem?
Step-by-step explanation:
