Answer:
<h2> The cost of a candy is $1.25</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
given the total amount at hand is $25
let the price of candy be x
then the cost of 3 candy will be 3x
the cost of a candy snake is $12.50.
balance at hand after the end of buying $8.75
the total expenses summed up must equal the initial amount at hand which is $25
the expression for the scenario is 3x+12.5+8.75=25
3x+21.25=25
3x=25-21.25
3x=3.75
x=3.75/3
x=$1.25
The cost of a candy is $1.25
Answer:
<h2>b) 4,5,15</h2><h2 />
Step-by-step explanation:
In a triangle of sides‘s length a , b and c
in order to be able to form (construct) this triangle we must have :
c - a < b < c + a
in fact this work with cases a) ,c) and d)
but not b)
because 15 - 4 is not < to 5
in other words 15 - 4 > 5
For this one, an easy way to solve it is to break it down into parts. First lets convert 5 feet to inches.
Multiply the number of feet by how many inches are in one foot.
5 times 12= 60 in
Now just add the like terms
60 in + 2 in= 62 inches.
Now we see that Sarah is 62 inches tall, now we can convert to centimeters the same way.
62 times 2.54= 157.48
So that makes C your answer, Sarah is 157.48 cm tall.
Yes, since 3 times 1.5 is 4 and 2 times 1.5 is 3.
In first trails there are 3 cups of peanuts mixed with 2 cups of raisins.
Therefore ratio of peanut to raisins is
For second trail 4.5 cup of peanuts mixed with 3 cups of raisins
Answer: Choice C
Amy is correct because a nonlinear association could increase along the whole data set, while being steeper in some parts than others. The scatterplot could be linear or nonlinear.
======================================================
Explanation:
Just because the data points trend upward (as you go from left to right), it does not mean the data is linearly associated.
Consider a parabola that goes uphill, or an exponential curve that does the same. Both are nonlinear. If we have points close to or on these nonlinear curves, then we consider the scatterplot to have nonlinear association.
Also, you could have points randomly scattered about that don't fit either of those two functions, or any elementary math function your teacher has discussed so far, and yet the points could trend upward. If the points are not close to the same straight line, then we don't have linear association.
-----------------
In short, if the points all fall on the same line or close to it, then we have linear association. Otherwise, we have nonlinear association of some kind.
Joseph's claim that an increasing trend is not enough evidence to conclude the scatterplot is linear or not.
