Answer:
The advantage is that there would be no disagreement among the House, the Senate and the Presidency. So all decisions would be unanimous, therefore there would be less time-consuming deberation.
Explanation:
The disadvantage with this state of affairs would be that there would not really be representation of citizens´ points of view, nor from other parties. So all the affairs of the nation would be in hands of people of only one political preference.
<u>Answer:</u>
No, some bargles are not definitely munhatsens.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- The relation that is stated in the narration can be said to be an indefinite relation. It is stated that some bargles are chongos but there is no detailing about exactly which bargles are chongos.
- Similarly, it is stated that some chongos are munhatsens, but no information has been given about exactly which chongos are munhatsens.
- Hence, a definite claim of some bargles being munhatsens cannot be made because it is not clear whether the chongos that are bargles are itself munhatsens.
The third answer (top to bottom): welfare spending, federal government intervention, organized labor.
Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal found one of its opponents, the Governor Eugene Talmadge. He was governor of Georgia (1932) and was popular with the rural people. He opposed programs calling for greater government spending and economic regulation. His anti-corporate, pro-evangelical and white-supremacist tirades had great appeal.
In Talmadge government, Georgia state subverted some of the early New Deal programs (federal relief programs for example). He wanted the workers to have an incentive to return to private employers. He allied with conservative business interests by <u>opposing government regulation, welfare spending, and the interests of organized labor</u>.
