Answer:
The answer is conventional reasoning.
Explanation:
Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development are considered an adaptation concerning a psychological theory that was established by psychologist Jean Piaget. Kohlberg also began to work in aspects related to this topic in 1958 and he continued studying it throughout his life.
The conventional level of moral reasoning is usually seen in adolescents and adults. Reasoning in a conventional way implies to judge actions' morality through the comparisons between them and the aspects related to views and expectations in society. An important characteristic concerning conventional morality consists of the acceptance of society's conventions about what is wrong and what is right.
Answer:
Signal lights have an important safety function. They demonstrate deceleration and a change in direction of the vehicle, and make the vehicle more visible to other road users when it is dark or during poor visibility.
Explanation:
Answer:
The most powerful group was the Spaniards, people born in Spain and sent across the Atlantic to rule the colony. Only Spaniards could hold high-level jobs in the colonial government. The second group, called creoles, were people of Spanish background but born in Mexico.
Have an amazing day! <3
Answer:
1. the sun is the largest star is true. 2. the coolest stars are red true. 3. the brighter the star the bigger is false. 4. all stars are made out of gasses and are the same size and color is false. 5. a star's luminosity is the same as its apparent brightness is false.
Explanation:
Answer:
<em>I can see that there are no choices.</em>
fallacy of bandwagon
Explanation:
A "logical fallacy" refers to the error of reasoning or logical gap that makes an argument invalid.
The situation above commits the fallacy of the bandwagon because the argument is being supported only according to a significant number of population. This is a fallacy because it doesn't necessarily mean all of the retired persons are unhappy about the level of Social Security assistance due to the opinion of 30 persons who agreed that they were unhappy. It becomes a "standalone justification" of the validity of an argument. We cannot judge the happiness or unhappiness of all retired persons according only to a group of 30 persons <em>(even though they were chosen from different parts of the country). </em>
So, this explains the answer.
