Answer:
adversary system
Explanation:
The adversary system is a legal system mostly found in common law countries where two distinct advocates represent their political group’s case or stands before a jury or judge in order to ascertain the truth and ensure judgement is passed accordingly. Criminal trial courts operate in this system and the accused person is not usually being asked to give any form of evidence in adversarial proceedings.
Answer: the court will use in personam jurisdiction.
Explanation:
Personal jurisdiction is the court's authority to determine personal rights and liabilities of the parties before it. Under personal jurisdiction the court has the authority to decide matters of a particular defendant (in personam jurisdiction) or an item of property (in rem jurisdiction).
<span>The right answer is the superego. The superego is a psychic entity proposed in the psychoanalysis theory of Sigmund Freud. He postulates that the human mind possesses three psychic entities that are antagonistic to each other, in various situations throughout life they come into conflict and from the resolution of those conflicts our behavior takes place. The 3 entities are the id, the ego, and the superego. <span>The superego directs the principle of morality and compliance with the rules.
I hope my answer can help you.
</span></span>
Answer:
Which king? You gotta be more specific bud
Explanation:
It is important to understand that the construction of identities, when analyzed in contemporary times, must be viewed from two dimensions: “Conflicting diversity within the nation-state (regions, ethnic issues, etc.) and the emergence of transnational identity references. For example, the world of consumption. Different social groups can thus appropriate globalized symbolic references (from Madonna to hip-hop) to construct their own image, their “identity”. There is, therefore, a situation within which different "identities" complement or enter into dispute. The monopoly that the state had (or thought it had) collapsed. The construction of national identity must now be done in a context of diversification that previously did not exist, technological transformations are obviously important, but one should not fall into a reductionist temptation that gives technologies a transformative capacity that they do not possess. The world will no longer be democratic because the technologies we have are more sophisticated. Today there is a certain technological panacea that often deludes us. Social problems will not be solved with 'more technology' or 'less'.
