Answer:
The correct answer is option d. stronger environmental regulations.
Explanation:
According to a recent Pew Research Center poll, young adults are substantially more likely than senior citizens to support stronger environmental regulations.
The study revealed that adults aged 30 years and younger were in great favor of stronger environmental regulations. It seemed that they were educated regarding the current situation of the environment and how it can be controlled for a better and safe living.
Answer:
a).there was no way to foresee that the incident would happen.
Explanation:
The green revolution was a time when a series of chemical products and agricultural techniques were developed with the aim of increasing world agricultural production. This revolution has achieved its objective and to transform agricultural practices in a drastic way, increasing food production intensely.
The success of the green revolution was even more notable in very populous countries such as China and India which have a very high demand for food.
In addition to the demand for food, India has a high demand for fuels and jobs, factors that the green revolution helped to manage, since agricultural products can be used in the manufacture of some clean energy fuels, in addition to country, the agricultural sector employs 5 out of 6 citizens.
Although the service sector, India is prominent, the country is highly dependent on the agricultural sector, which has the capacity to supply the country's needs through the development created by the green revolution.
Answer:
Multiple reimbursement scheme
Explanation:
What Donna Holbrook did is considered a case of multiple reimbursement. This means she requested the payment of the expense more than once. She first used the company credit card to buy the office supplies. This means that she didn’t use her own money because the credit card wasn’t hers. But a month after that, she used the receipt to request reimbursement from the company implying that she bought those supplies with her own money. By doing so, the company is paying twice for a purchase that was done only once. There’re also other kind of expense reimbursement schemes: <u>fictitious expense schemes</u> (when the expense is actually not real but made up by the employee); <u>overstated expense schemes</u> (when the employee inflates the expense in order to keep the extra money); and <u>mischaracterized expense schemes</u> (this occurs when the employee intends to get reimbursement for an expense that is personal and not related to the business).