Answer:
Money serves as a medium of exchange, as a store of value, and as a unit of account.
Answer:
each policy will pay $25,000 of the loss
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the each policy will pay $25,000 of the loss. This is an equal share for each policy and is due to them having the pro rata liability clause. This clause states that a policy is only liable for an equal percentage of the loss if the insurer has other policies from other companies. As in this case.
Problem-solving team are known to be people or members of a team from the same department that's involved in efforts to improve work activities. Danielle belongs to a problem solving team.
Members of a problem solving team often share ideas or offer suggestions on how work processes and methods can be improved.
Problem solving is is a vital part of business. It is said as working through difficulties and overcoming challenges. It entails finding solutions helps us to excel and advance forward.
It is known to help company understand the right approach to problem solving and also to work smarter.
Learn more from
brainly.com/question/18624628
Answer:
$6,734
Explanation:
On December 31, there were 46 units remaining in ending inventory.
These 46 units consisted of
6 from January x $123 = 738
8 from February x $133 = 1064
10 from May x $143 = 1430
8 from September x $153 = 1224
14 from November x $163 = 2282
Using the specific identification method, the cost of the ending inventory is: 734 + 1064 + 1430 + 1224 + 2282 = $6734
Answer:
procedural unconscionability
Explanation:
Since Nate is finding the language of the contract difficult to understand. This is most likely a case of procedural unconscionability.
In contract law, procedural unconscionability refers to a situation where the unconscionability results from <u>inequalities between the parties in respect of age, intelligence,</u> and relative bargaining power.
Furthermore, procedural unconscionability projects an indication that both parties did not freely consent to all terms proposed.
