Answer:
Disgusted.
Explanation:
After being restricted for so long on the things they can own or do, it must have been hurtful and sad to see that nobody on the outside understands the situation they are actually in. It must make them feel hopeless, and in disgust as their situation can seem so bright to people who aren't there.
Scientists should definitely use evidence - and they collect this evidence though especially designed experiments. Based on their data and assumptions they build models which they then test, but they can base their conclusions based on the models too.
What they should not do is based the conclusions on opinions, because opinions are not imparcial- they can state them as opinions, but not as conclusions.
<span />
Answer:
The correct option is: B. People with these disorders exhibit a personality style that differs markedly from the expectations of their culture
Explanation:
Dissociative disorders are defined as the medical condition caused by some form of psychological stress or trauma and are characterized by breakdown or disruption of self awareness, memory, perception or identity of an individual.
Dissociative disorders includes Dissociative identity disorder, Dissociative amnesia, Dissociative fugue, Dissociative seizuresm, Depersonalization disorder.
<u>Therefore, option B. is false of dissociative disorders.</u>
Unlike robbery, picking pockets does not involve "force or fear".
<span>The focal prerequisite of robbery is that the taking be by methods for either force or fear. One regular kind of theft including force is robbing, in which the criminal snatches the casualty around the neck from the back and persuasively expels his wallet or different resources. Other regular sorts of force include hitting a casualty with the clench hands, a firearm, or a limit protest. Cutting a victim's pocket is usually not deliberated robbery as there is no usage of fear and because robbery needs more force than that required simply to eliminate the property. </span>
